🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."